7/20/2023 0 Comments Adobe adobe camera raw resolution![]() 3CCD is superior, it demands more resources from man and machine, like large format did in the film days. If you use SFD mode on Sigma cameras you get an image with more detail than a medium format digital camera. This problem is barely visible on ISO 100. The whole discussion ends with ISO, there Bayer has less issues, since three CCDs means three times the noise. On a full frame Foveon sensor you would get an image with resolution equal to a 150MP Bayer sensor with same pixel size. An APS-C Foveon sensor generates equal information as a full frame Bayer sensor post interpolation on the Foveon sensor. Loss in sharpness after interpolation can be compared to the Bayer image straight from sensor. The difference is that when you interpolate a Foveon image there is a calculation made from a complete depth, so there are few or none artifacts. A 20MP Foveon sensor has in practice 60MP. Then you're referring to resolution in width, not depth. The incompleteness only becomes more visible. What you all are doing is putting lipstick on a pig, slaves to companies using the dripping machine on you. If your image is great you won't care about resolution. ![]() If ISO is the priority then use a 1CMOS camera and ignore quality. Only 3CCD is a complete digital image, the only 3CCD sensor for stills is Foveon. With a 1CMOS sensor you only have a crippled image to work with, efforts will be wasted to hide that your tool is insufficient. Resolution is a question of depth, not width, but if you have depth the computer can generate width. ![]() With Bayer it just looks like artificial mush. You can print images 100x70″ large with Foveon. Bayer is interpolated from the get go, colors not real on images made with one sensor, added through an algorithm. Looks a bit weird with sharp windows and fuzzy leaves. Make sharper vertical and horizontal edges. * Bayer interpolation algorithms are strange. * Bayer interpolation lowers the local contrast. You might get unwanted rainbows and other stuff. RGB cameras usually results in warm and cold images in natural light. Generally, Foveon sensor have a hard time distinguish between green and magenta. Bayer color mosaic images and Foveon based ones look. So take a tour around the studio scene and see what you think, and watch this space for some testing with real world Super Resolution image comparisons in the coming weeks. ![]() As you might expect, you don't quite get benchmark-camera levels of detail (and we wanted to do Super Resolution on the Phase One image, but at the time of this writing, the resulting file exceeds the feature's 500MP resolution limit). (Also, try hitting the 'Comp' button at the top to see what the Super Resolution files look like scaled back to the lowest common pixel count.)Īnd just for fun, we wanted to see what super resolution does on those higher-megapixel bodies as well. We can't bring one of those modern camera bodies back in time to re-shoot our favorite images, and so for many situations, this feature will absolutely breathe new life into older files. Modern, high-resolution bodies with quality lenses will beat the algorithm anywhere you look, but that's not necessarily the point. Of course you'll notice that this feature isn't magic. In some of our other informal testing with real-world images, we've found areas of more natural textures seem to look pretty good, so be sure to check out those areas of the test scene.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |